Μεταφράστε τη σελίδα

Αναζήτηση / Search

Socratic News


Are you interested in Democracy ?

InfoWar / Ὀσο εσύ κοιμάσαι ...

Σάββατο, 10 Μαρτίου 2012

Π. ΚΑΜΜΕΝΟΣ ΗΡΘΕ ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΜΕΙΝΕΙ 6-3-2012

Κύριοι βουλευτές δείτε αυτό το βίντεο..

Δίκαιο Λουξεμβρούργου ισχύει για το Μνημόνιο

 

Χρυσές Λέσχες Ολιγαρχισμού

Οι ΗΠΑ φοβούνται τον Καζάκη: 'Ελληνας δημοσιογράφος

ΠΗΓΗ e-volos.gr/
ΠΟΙΟΙ ΠΡΟΣΠΑΘΗΣΑΝ να κόψουν συνέντευξή του σε ομογενειακό ραδιόφωνο της Νέας Υόρκης;

ΑΚΟΥΣΤΕ τα όσα δήλωσε, μιλώντας στο "Marconi Radio 96,1 F.M." του Βόλου και στην εκπομπή "Συμβαίνει Τώρα" του Αντώνη Κουμιώτη, ο Έλληνας δημοσιογράφος στη Νέα Υόρκη Δημήτρης Φιλιππίδης, στην εκπομπή του οποίου, στον ομογενειακό Ρ/Σ Hellas FM, φιλοξενήθηκε πριν λίγες ημέρες ο Οικονομολόγος Δημήτρης Καζάκης.

Καρατζαφέρης: "Αυτό δεν είναι ευγένεια, ούτε Ευγενία"!

Απολαύστε τη καθαρότητα των Πολιτικών


Economics 201 Game Theory Dictator Game

ΔΗΛΩΣΕΙΣ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΔΗ-ΚΑΖΑΚΗ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΗΝ ΣΥΓΚΡΟΥΣΗ ΡΑΔΙΟ9

Free Hugs
Free Hugs (Photo credit: wdroops)
Ε.ΠΑ.Μ. ΣΕΛΙΔΑ - http://www.epam-hellas.gr/

ΣΕΙΣΑΧΘΕΙΑ - http://www.seisaxthia-epam.blogspot.com/

Ε.ΠΑ.Μ. WEB TV - http://www.livestream.com/epamwebtv

Ε.ΠΑ.Μ. FACEBOOK - http://www.facebook.com/metopo



Enhanced by Zemanta

Horse iPad

Unveiling the latest revolution in equine technology. Keep up to date with news, for horses. Surf websites, for horses. Connect with friends, who are horses. From the sketch show Dawson Bros Funtime. Coming to BBC Three online and iPlayer. Soon. Or later than that.

Απάντηση στους ορθοδόξους που καταφέρονται κατά του Καμμένου

Greece-1178
Greece-1178 (Photo credit: archer10 (Dennis) Busy)

Το Ελληνικό Πνεύμα του Διαφωτισμού έχει να κάνει με την επαναφορά το Λόγου και της Λογικής και τη κατάργηση της θεοκρατίας του φόβου και των φανταστικών μεταθανάτιων κολάσεων.

Ο Έλληνας είναι ΕΛ (φώς γνώσης) και ο θρησκευτισμός είναι απόρριψη κάθε αποδεικτικής μεθόδου (σκοταδισμός του Πνεύματος).

Τα περί ορθοδοξίας τα μάθατε όχι εκ προθέσεως αλλά εξ᾽ επιβολής από τις πρώτες μέρες που γεννηθήκατε. Κατασκευάσματα των ανθρώπινων φαντασιών ονομάζονται Ορθά . Που είναι η Ορθότητα σε αυτού του είδους την λογική;

Ορθώς Δοκώ;  Σωστά Νομίζω;  Εάν είσαι Ορθός τότε δε Νομίζεις και εάν Νομίζεις είναι πλάνη να το ονομάζεις Σωστό (Ορθό) .

Η ίδια η λέξη ορθοδοξία είναι οξύμωρο σχήμα στη Ελληνική Γλώσσα.

Το πρόβλημα των νεοελλήνων είναι ότι είναι ελληνόφωνοι αλλά όχι Έλληνες κατά τη Γνώση, Παράδοση και Πνεύμα.

Τα χριστιανικά στην Ελλάδα είναι διάλεκτος  που ναι μεν χρησιμοποιεί Ελληνικές λέξεις αλλά όχι με την Ελληνική Ετυμολογία τους.

Αυτό είναι είδος Πνευματικού Μιξοβαρβαρισμού

Όταν οι λέξεις χρησιμοποιούνται με το Ελληνικό τους νόημα τότε οι άνθρωποι θα μάθουν τι σημαίνει Ελληνικό Πνεύμα και Λογική.

Η θρησκειολογική επίθεση σε ότι δεν είναι "μαζί" με τους "καθαρούς Χριστιανούς" έχει τόση αξία όση και οι δικαιολογίες των Ισλαμιστών για τον εξισλαμισμό των Ευρωπαίων, και ίση με τις δικαολογίες των "Σταυροφόρων".

Η ιδέα ότι η Ελλάς ανήκει στην "Ορθοδοξία" είναι ένα κακό ψεύδος που μόνη επιβουλή του έχει το να προσπαθεί εδώ και χιλιάδες χρόνια να θάψει ζωντανή την Ελληνική Ελύθερη Σκέψη και ακόμα δεν τα κατάφερε.

"Πολιτικάντιδες" είναι άλλοι , όσοι θέλουν να εγκαθιδρύσουν θεοκρατισμούς στις κοινωνίες και το παίζουν φίλοι του "θεού" τους , άρα και πράκτορες των απάνθρωπων επιβουλών να καταργήσουν την Ελεύθερη Σκέψη.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Crazy Watering Can

A homework assignment. Shot in two afternoons, with a Canon 7D. First year at "Bezalel" school of art and design, Jerusaelm.
Music by Gnarls Barkley. Filmed, directed and edited by Vania Heymann

Crazy Watering Can from vania heymann on Vimeo.

Πέμπτη, 8 Μαρτίου 2012

NASA Crushes 2012 Mayan Apocalypse Claims

Artist's rendition of Earth's magnetosphere.
Image via Wikipedia
by Natalie Wolchover, Life's Little Mysteries 

Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory have put out a new video to address false claims about the "Mayan apocalypse," a non-event that some people believe will take place Dec. 21.

In the video, which was posted online Wednesday (Mar. 7), Don Yeomans, head of the Near-Earth Objects Program Office at NASA/JPL, explains away many of the most frequently cited doomsday scenarios. [See video]

Addressing the belief that the calendar used by the ancient Mayan civilization comes to a sudden end in December 2012, and that this will coincide with a cataclysmic, world-ending event, Yeomans said: "Their calendar does not end on December 21, 2012; it's just the end of the cycle and the beginning of a new one. It's just like on December 31, our calendar comes to an end, but a new calendar begins on January 1."

Yeomans also attempted to allay fears regarding potential causes of a Mayan apocalypse, including Nibiru, an imaginary planet that some people think is swinging in from the outer solar system just in time to collide with Earth in December. "This enormous planet is supposed to be coming toward Earth, but if it were, we would have seen it long ago. And if it were invisible somehow, we would have seen the [gravitational] effects of this planet on neighboring planets. Thousands of astronomers who scan the sky on a daily basis have not seen this," he said. [Believers In Mysterious Planet Nibiru Await Earth's End]

He added that there is zero possibility of a NASA cover-up. "Can you imagine thousands of astronomers who observe the skies on a daily basis keeping the same secret from the public for several years?"

As for solar flaresYeomans explained that these do exist — in fact, two massive solar flares 

erupted just days ago, sending bursts of solar radiation into space — but they are part of the sun's normal 11-year cycle. Radiation from solar flares can damage orbiting satellites, but Earth's magnetosphere shields its inhabitants from the blasts, and the flares are not a health concern.

"Then we have planetary alignments," Yeomans said. Some doomsayers believe the other planets and the sun will align with the Earth in December and cause catastrophic tidal effects. "Well, first of all, there are no planetary alignments in December of 2012, and even if there were, there are no tidal effects on the Earth as a result. The only two bodies in the solar system that can affect the Earth's tides 

are the moon, which is very close, and the sun, which is massive and also fairly close. But the other planets have a negligible effect on the Earth."

(Incidentally, it is perfectly normal for the sun and moon to align, bolstering each other's gravitational pulls on Earth and generating higher-than-normal ocean tides. This happens twice each month.)

Addressing the claim that Earth's axes are going to shift on Dec. 21, 2012, he said: "The rotation axis can't shift because the orbit of the moon around the Earth stabilizes it and doesn't allow it to shift." He noted that the magnetic field does shift every half-million years or so, but "there's no evidence it's going to happen in December, and even if it were to be shifting, it takes thousands of years to do so. And even if it did shift, it's not going to cause a problem on the Earth apart from the fact that we're going to have to recalibrate our compasses." [What If Earth's Magnetic Poles Flip?]

Invoking the astronomer Carl Sagan's famous maxim, he said: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Since the beginning of time there have been literally hundreds of thousands of predictions for the end of the world, and we're still here."



Enhanced by Zemanta

Τετάρτη, 7 Μαρτίου 2012

ΟΙ ΠΟΝΤΙΟΙ - Όμορφη είναι;

Βουτσάς, Τσάκωνας, Γερασιμίδου στην κλασική σκηνή. The best


Harry Klynn - Trampakoulas - E.E. - H Mitsous

Arithmetics in our life. How much important could be?

2 million views for an old codger giving a lecture about arithmetic? What's going on? You'll just have to watch to see what's so damn amazing about what he (Prof. Albert Bartlett) has to say.

When I saw this lecture at a conference in 1995, I came out blasted, thinking "This needs to be required listening for every person on the planet. Nothing else will matter if we don't understand this." The presenter is Albert Bartlett, a retired Physics prof. at U of Colorado-Boulder.

The presentation is titled "Arithmetic, Population, and Energy," and I introduce it to my students as "The most boring video you'll ever see, and the most important." But then again, after viewing it most said that if you followed along with what Bartlett is saying, it's quite easy to pay attention, because the content is so damn compelling.

If you forward this to everyone you know, we might actually stand a chance in staving off disaster in the global finance system, peak oil, climate change, and every other resource issue you can think of. Without a widespread understanding of what Bartlett's talking about, I think we won't be able to dodge ANY of those issues.

BE ABSOLUTELY SURE you catch the parts about "the bacteria in the bottle" (in Part 3) and the list comparing things that add to the problem and things that address the problem. If we don't choose from that right-hand column, nature will choose for us.

I for one, would rather we be the ones making the choice.

Memories are Made of This

Eric R. Kandel, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator, examines whether the brain's two major memory systems, implicit and explicit, have any common features. Implicit and explicit memory both have a short-term component lasting minutes, such as remembering the telephone number you just looked up, and a long-term component that lasts days, weeks, or a lifetime, such as remembering your mother's birthday. Short-term memory is mediated by modifications of existing proteins, leading to temporary changes in the strength of communication between nerve cells. In contrast, long-term memory involves alterations of gene expression, synthesis of new proteins and growth of new synaptic connections.

CFI-NYC | The Science and Philosophy of Free Will

Are advances in the scientific understanding of the human mind shaping our conception of free will? If so, how? Are the cognitive sciences revealing that free will does not exist, or are they merely shedding light on the inner workings of agency? And do the answers to these questions have implications for moral responsibility?

On Nov. 6, 2011, the Center for Inquiry-New York City explored these and related questions by presenting a panel discussion featuring:

* Hakwan Lau, Columbia University.
* Alfred Mele, Florida State University.
* Jesse Prinz, City University of New York.
* Adina Roskies, Dartmouth College.
* Massimo Pigliucci, City University of New York.

This event was held at the Auditorium on Broadway. It was the second in our "Science and Philosophy" series. The first event focused on consciousness.

For more:

www.centerforinquiry.net/nyc

Τρίτη, 6 Μαρτίου 2012

CFI-NYC | The Science and Philosophy of Consciousness

On Feb. 13, 2011, the Center for Inquiry-New York City and New York City Skeptics presented a Darwin Day forum featuring NYU philosopher Ned Block, and Jacqueline Gottlieb, neuroscientist at Columbia University. The speakers made presentations about their respective philosophical and scientific approaches to consciousness, then sat down for a question-and-answer session with Massimo Pigliucci, chair of the philosophy department at Lehman College. The event was held at New York University in Tishman Auditorium.

Cheetah Robot Gallops at 18 mph

Cheetah is a new robot being developed by Boston Dynamics with funding from DARPA's Maximum Mobility and Manipulation program. Last week Cheetah set a new land speed record for legged robots, galloping 18 mph on the treadmill. This version of the Cheetah is a lab prototype with offboard power and a boom that planarizes its motion. Testing on a free-running version of the Cheetah that will run 'unplugged' in the field starts later this year. For more information about Cheetah or the other robots we develop, visit www.BostonDynamics.com.


Ο μεγάλος Καβάφης για το Μνημόνιο στην Ελλάδα, έχει ιστορία το σπορ αυτό

Κυριακή, 4 Μαρτίου 2012

ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι, ἐδόθη μοι σκόλοψ τῇ σαρκί : Τί είναι σκόλοψ ;

greek study desk
greek study desk (Photo credit: josephpetepickle)
Για να δούμε τις αναφορές στην ελληνική λέξη σκόλοψ στις αναφορές του εγχειρήματος "Περσέας" ...

και τις αναφορές της βίβλου στη λέξη αυτή ...


Ο σκόλοψ είναι α) ότι αιχμηρό β) χειρουργικό εργαλείο για την ουρήθρα γ) αγκίστρι.

Ποιά από τις άνωθεν αναφορές τυγχάνει να αποδίδει το νόημα στην επιστολή του Παύλου;

Ας λάβουμε υπ᾽ όψιν ότι ο ωραιομορφισμός των μεταφράσεων διαλέγει την ηπιώτερη των "κακών" και την ενδοξότερη των "καλών" νοημάτων.

Στη πραγματικότητα ο ωραιομορφισμός είναι επίτηδες παραμόρφωση της αλήθειας.




Παραβάλλονται κείμενα της βίβλου και του Περσέα:



ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Β΄ 12:7 Greek NT: Westcott/Hort with Diacritics 


καὶ τῇ ὑπερβολῇ τῶν ἀποκαλύψεων. διὸ ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι, ἐδόθη μοι σκόλοψ τῇ σαρκί, ἄγγελος σατανᾶ, ἵνα με κολαφίζῃ. ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι.


ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Β΄ 12:7 Greek NT: Greek Orthodox Church

Καὶ τῇ ὑπερβολῇ τῶν ἀποκαλύψεων ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι, ἐδόθη μοι σκόλοψ τῇ σαρκί, ἄγγελος σατᾶν, ἵνα με κολαφίζῃ ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι.

ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Β΄ 12:7 Greek NT: Tischendorf 8th Ed. with Diacritics


καὶ τῇ ὑπερβολῇ τῶν ἀποκαλύψεων ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι, ἐδόθη μοι σκόλοψ τῇ σαρκί, ἄγγελος σατανᾶ, ἵνα με κολαφίζῃ, ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι.

ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Β΄ 12:7 Greek NT: Stephanus Textus Receptus (1550, with accents)

καὶ τῇ ὑπερβολῇ τῶν ἀποκαλύψεων ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι ἐδόθη μοι σκόλοψ τῇ σαρκί ἄγγελος Σατᾶν, ἵνα με κολαφίζῃ ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι

ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Β΄ 12:7 Greek NT: Byzantine/Majority Text (2000)

και τη υπερβολη των αποκαλυψεων ινα μη υπεραιρωμαι εδοθη μοι σκολοψ τη σαρκι αγγελος σαταν ινα με κολαφιζη ινα μη υπεραιρωμαι

ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Β΄ 12:7 Greek NT: Textus Receptus (1894)

και τη υπερβολη των αποκαλυψεων ινα μη υπεραιρωμαι εδοθη μοι σκολοψ τη σαρκι αγγελος σαταν ινα με κολαφιζη ινα μη υπεραιρωμαι



καὶ τῇ ὑπερβολῇ τῶν ἀποκαλύψεων. διὸ ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι, ἐδόθη μοι σκόλοψ τῇ σαρκί, ἄγγελος σατανᾶ, ἵνα με κολαφίζῃ. ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι.



2 Corinthians 12:7 Hebrew Bibleולמען אשר לא אתרומם ברב גדל החזינות נתן לי סלון בבשרי מלאך השטן להכתני באגרוף למען לא אתרומם׃


Περσεύς :


σκόλοψ , οπος,
2. thorn, IG42(1).121.92 (Epid., iv B.C.), LXX Nu.33.55, al., Dsc.4.49Babr.122; “σκόλοπες φοίνικος” PMag.Osl.1.270, al., cf. 2 Ep.Cor.12.7.
3. an instrument for operating on the urethraHeliod. ap. Orib.50.9.4.
4. point of a fishing-hookLuc.Merc.Cond.3.
II. treeE.Ba.983 (lyr.).
Enhanced by Zemanta

How to defend free speech: Nick Cohen's 10-point guide

http://newhumanist.org.uk/2750/how-to-defend-free-speech

How to defend free speech

With the persecution of Salman Rushdie, the continuing furore over ‘offensive cartoons’, and polluters, dictators and terrorist bagmen using British libel law to shield their misdeeds from public scrutiny, the opponents of free speech have never had it so good. This is Nick Cohen’s ten-point plan to stop the rot, protect free expression and turn back the tide of outrage that threatens our right to speak
Get a six month subscription to New Humanist magazine for only £1 (offer available to new UK subscribers only).

New Humanist cover March/April 20121) The political is not personal



The private life of civilised society is built on white lies. Our relations with others would break down if we did not restrain free speech and treat them with respect. No one, however, should demand respect for public ideas that have the power to oppress others. Religious and political ideas are too important to protect with polite deceits because their adherents seek to control all aspects of public and private life.

2) The personal is not political


However hard journalists find it to argue for the suppression of the truth, demands for a right to privacy are justifiable. They will grow as the Net replaces the anonymity of the 20th century city, which was so well suited to anonymous liaisons, with a global village. As in all villages, tell-tales, peeping Toms and poison pens will proliferate. The Net makes ineradicable proofs of past indiscretions available to employers, police forces, corporations, democratic governments, dictatorial states and malicious gossips. Soon many will realise that the new technologies are a secret policeman’s dream.

It is symptomatic of the banality of contemporary debate that the only argument we hear about privacy is the argument between celebrities’ lawyers and tabloid editors – a struggle that recalls the joke about the Iran-Iraq war that “it is a pity they can’t both lose”. As we must deal with celebrities before we can move on, the best solution would be for the courts to offer them protection, but override their privacy rights and allow publication if there is even a small public interest in exposure. To do that we need judges who instinctively value free debate and are alert to the dangers of the wealthy manipulating the law. If such judges are impossible to find, we should restrict privacy rights for all public figures as the Americans do. 

3) Respect is the enemy of tolerance



The loud calls from the religious for censorship in the name of “respect” reveal the fatuity of modern faith. The religious do not say that they are defending the truth from libellous attack because in their hearts they know they cannot defend the truth of their holy books. So, like celebrities’ lawyers trying to hide dirty secrets, they threaten the gains made in the struggle for religious toleration by saying that those who ask searching questions of religion must be punished for invading the privacy of the pious.


Religious toleration allowed freedom of religion and freedom from religion. The demand to “respect” religion is an attempt to push back the gains of the Enlightenment by forbidding the essential arguments that religious toleration allowed.

4) If you are frightened, at least have the guts to say so

Once one did not write the word “liberal” and add “hypocrite”. Since the Rushdie Affair, the reflex has become automatic. The worst aspect of the fear the Islamists spread was that Western intellectuals were afraid of admitting that they were afraid. If they had been honest, they would have forced society to confront the fact of censorship. As it was, their silence made the enemies of liberalism stronger.

5) Once you have paid him the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane

The slide from religious fanatics calling for the murder of Salman Rushdie because he had written a blasphemous novel to murdering Salman Taseer merely for opposing the death penalty for blasphemy shows how appeasement feeds the beast it seeks to tame. All dictatorial systems, secular and religious, have a capacity to go postal: to move from attacks on their enemies which can be rationally explained to random, almost meaningless assaults on the smallest transgressions. It is best to stop them before they get started.

6) Democracy does not end at the office door

Demands for elected worker-directors and stronger protections for whistleblowers are always justifiable because they restrict the power of the plutocracy. The banking crisis revealed that they could also protect national security. Sensible countries should treat banks as if they were hostile foreign powers, and enable, protect and honour those who reveal the threats they pose to wider society.

7) The wealthy have means enough to defend themselves, they do not need the law to add to them

Free speech has advanced by a process of declaring subjects too important for states to censor. The American revolutionaries of 1776 said the law had no right to interfere in religious debates. The gains of the Enlightenment and the struggle against the European dictatorships led to the acceptance by democracies that no one should regulate political ideas. The battles of the Civil Rights Movement in the American South established that public figures in the United States could not seek the law’s protection unless they were victims of “malicious” attack – that is, from critics who showed a reckless disregard for the truth. Europe should import that protection and ensure it covers business as well as politics. Given the dangers the financial system poses to modern democracies, the law should not allow CEOs, corporations and financiers the right to use their considerable wealth to limit free discussion of their affairs.

8) Beware of anyone who begins a sentence with “there’s no such thing as absolute free speech so…”



…for they will end it by saying something scandalous. John Stuart Mill’s principle that censorship should be applied only in extreme circumstances remains the best guide to follow. British libel lawyers’ assault on scientists shows that when society gives censors vague powers they never confine themselves to deserving targets. They are not snipers but machine gunners. Allow them


to fire at will, and they will hit anything that moves.

9) Location, Location, Location

It is not what you say, but where you say it. The freedom the Net brings is illusory if it confines writers to working under pseudonyms in obscure corners of the Web. Writers who wish to be heard must break from the fringe into the mainstream by arguing for their ideas in the open. If they live in a dictatorship or a democracy with oppressive laws, they will find that on their own the new technologies offer few ways round the old restrictions on free debate.

10) The Net cannot set you free

Only politics can do that.

This is an extract from Nick Cohen’s You Can’t Read This Book, published by Fourth Estate

ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ/THE GREEKS

Five drachmae coin of the Cretan State (1901)Image via Wikipedia

Η ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΟΣ

ΣΕ ΑΥΤΟ ΤΟ ΚΑΝΑΛΙ ΘΑ ΒΡΕΙΤΕ ΣΠΟΥΔΑΙΑ ΝΤΟΚΙΜΑΝΤΕΡ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΑΡΧΑΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΝΕΟΤΕΡΗ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΜΕ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟΥΣ ΥΠΟΤΙΤΛΟΥΣ Ιn this channel will find great documentary surrounding the history of Greece


by Η ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΟΣ

Οι Αγνοημένοι Έλληνες της Ελληνικής Δημοκρατίας

Το Ελληνικό κράτος δεν έχει εθνική πολιτική, παρά παραθρησκευτικές επιλογές που τις εφαρμόζει ως νόμους , προεδρικά διατάγματα, διοικητικές πράξεις και υπουργικές εγκυκλίους.

Το νομικό κενό της Εθνικής Πολιτικής αυτού του κράτους είναι μεγαλύτερο και εγκληματικότερο του δημόσιου χρέους .

Οι μονοθεϊστικές θρησκείες διαιρούν ακόμα τν Ελληνισμό. Οι Έλληνες της Συρίας υποχρεὠθηκαν να γἰνουν Μουσσουλμάνοι και οι Έλληνες της Ρωμαϊκής διοίκησης υποχρεώθηκαν να γίνουν Χριστιανοί, οι δε Έλληνες στο θρἠσκευμα να εξοριστούν από την Ρωμαϊκή διοίκηση.

Και ακόμα και σήμερα που το κράτος ονομάζεται Ελληνική Δημοκρατία, στη πραγματικότητα εάν κάποιος δεν ανήκει στην Ορθόδοξη Χριστιανική ομάδα, δεν αναγνωρἰζεται ως Έλληνας. Η δικτάτορες του Ελληνοχριστιανισμού διαιροὐν εδώ και δεκαἐξι αιὠνες τον Ελληνισμό, βιάζοντας τον να "βαπτιστεί" σε Ελληνοχριστιανισμό, όπως λένε και στα "ιερά" βιβλία τους ... ὀστις θέλει ... αλλά αλοίμονο εάν δε θέλει ...

Τα ψεύδη στα οποία κατασκεύασε και χρησιμοποιεί για πολιτικούς εκβιασμούς η χριστιανική ομάδα είναι αμέτρητα.

Ο νηπιοβαπτισμός χρησιμοποιείται για να δείχνει στατιστικά τους Έλληνες να είναι πίστά μέλη και ακόλουθοι των παραλογισμών τους. Πόσοι θα βαπτίζονταν με τη θέληση τους και με πίστη στα λόγια τους εάν αυτή η πράξη έπρεπε να γίνεται αφού ενηλικιωθεί ο κάθε Έλληνας πολίτης;

Θεωρείται εχθρός και μή Έλληνας ο κάθε σκεπτικιστής, άθρησκος, άθεος, αλλόθρησκος, αβάπτιστος και πρακτικά ο μἠ "ορθόδοξος" χριστιανός. Λές και οι θρησκειολογικές φαντασιώσεις του καθένα Έλληνα τον κάνουν περισσότερο ή λιγότερο Έλληνα.

Αυτό το μἰσος και η αδιαφορία δεν στοχεύει μόνο τους άθεους αλλά και τους πιστούς σε άλλους θεούς.

Απορρίψανε τη θεογονία του Ησίοδου και τώρα μας σερβίρουν ένα κρύο πιάτο με ξένη συνταγή ως Ελληνική δογματολογία.

Τα αρχαία μας μνημεία το ελληνοχριστιανικό κράτος τα βλέπει ως αγελάδες για άρμεγμα εσόδων από "ξένους" λάτρεις του Ελληνικού Πνεύματος, συγκαταλέγουντας ανάμεσα στους "ξένους" και τους Έλληνες στο δόγμα. Η λατρεία του Ελληνικού Πνεύματος, απαιτεί "άδεια" από τον ορθόδοξο τοπικό επίσκοπο.

Οι παραλογισμοί και το μίσος του κράτους αυτού προς τον Ελληνισμό είναι αμέτρητης διάστασης. Κλέψανε το όνομα του Έλληνα και καταπιέζουν κάθε τι Ελληνικό να "ανθίσει" πνευματικά μέσα στα σύνορα αυτού του κράτους με μία μεγάλη λίστα από νόμους και εγκυκλίους της επίσημης κυβέρνησης.

Τί δικαίωμα μπορεί να έχει διοικητικό ή πολιτικό ένας επίσκοπος να επιτρέπει ή να απαγορεύει κάθε πολίτη να ασκεί τα ίδια θρησκευτικά ή μή δρώμενα.

Τι σχέση έχει ο ορθόδοξος χριστιανισμός με τον ορισμό του Έλληνα πολίτη; Τί θέλουν τέτοιου είδους εγκύκλιοι να διαμορφὠνουν τις αποφάσεις περί απόδοσης της Ελληνικής Ιθαγένειας; Εάν η ιθαγένεια καθορίζεται από θρησκευτικούς κανόνες γιατί τότε το κράτος λέθεται Ελληνική Δημοκρατία και όχι Ορθόδοξη Χριστιανική Θρησκειοκρατία;


















Signed by
people till now
more..
Read about the petition:
English French Italian German Portugal Dutch Spanish Greek

View Official YouTube Teaser (HD)